<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maximus Internet &#187; Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/index.php/tag/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog</link>
	<description>Internet Strategy &#124; Websites &#124; Search &#124; Email</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Have We Reached the Privacy Frontier?</title>
		<link>http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/have-we-reached-the-privacy-frontier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/have-we-reached-the-privacy-frontier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jminder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeted marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does it seems like news of companies overextending their welcome to user data and the resulting consumer backlash is reaching the boiling point?
In December, Google&#8217;s CEO, Eric Schmidt said &#8220;If you have something that you don&#8217;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place.&#8221;  &#8211; Google chief: Only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it seems like news of companies overextending their welcome to user data and the resulting consumer backlash is reaching the boiling point?</p>
<p>In December, Google&#8217;s CEO, Eric Schmidt said <em><strong>&#8220;If you have something that you don&#8217;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&#8217;t be doing it in the first place.&#8221;</strong> </em> &#8211; <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/07/schmidt_on_privacy/">Google chief: Only miscreants worry about net privacy</a> <span id="more-46"></span></p>
<p>That’s a bold statement for the CEO of any major company, especially Google, which has a <a title="Wikipedia - Criticism of Google" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google">history of criticism</a> for their privacy practices.  Google was also recently criticized for their handling of a <a title="Fast Company: Forget China: Is Google's Toolbar Spying on You? " href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/kit-eaton/technomix/forget-china-googles-toolbar-spying-you">privacy problem with the widely used Google Toolbar</a>.</p>
<p>By now, everyone knows about the famous <a title="Wikipedia - Facebook Beacon" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Beacon">Facebook Beacon</a> incident.  In December, Facebook made <a title="Mashable.com - Facebook’s New Privacy Push Concerns Experts" href="http://mashable.com/2009/12/10/facebook-privacy-experts/">another attempt to make user information more public</a> with their new privacy settings.  Facebook tried to spin the news as a win for users.  However, the changes were really designed to <strong>give Facebook evidence that users consented to sharing their information with the world</strong> even if users didn’t pay attention and selected Facebook’s “share with everyone” setting, the default if the user had not previously adjusted their privacy settings.</p>
<p>Many other major internet companies are employing similar strategies as they all struggle with the <strong>balance between keeping users happy and running profitable businesses.</strong> I respect that balance.  However, I have a problem with companies knowingly taking advantage of people who don’t read or understand their terms or bundle tracking software with other products in a misleading way.</p>
<p>I’m all for personal responsibility, but the fact is, <strong>most internet users don’t understand online privacy.</strong> The average person doesn’t know very much about what information is tracked, how companies use it, or how to control information collection on their computer through browser settings, add-ons, and software.</p>
<p><strong>What’s next?</strong> Are we approaching the limit of tolerance for these practices?  Will there be legal action?  Will consumers stop using some of these major services?  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/have-we-reached-the-privacy-frontier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Social Media Find a Working Business Model?</title>
		<link>http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/can-social-media-find-a-working-business-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/can-social-media-find-a-working-business-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jminder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yesterday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, there was an article about how new internet companies are a poor investment:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124784696163158721.html
All the big players have huge audiences and some have proven they can keep traffic coming back for more.  The only problem is that none of them make money.  As an internet user who never views an ad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In yesterday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, there was an article about how new internet companies are a poor investment:<br />
<a title="The Internet Is Dead (As an Investment)" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124784696163158721.html" target="_self">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124784696163158721.html</a></p>
<p>All the big players have huge audiences and some have proven they can keep traffic coming back for more.  The only problem is that <strong>none of them make money</strong>.  <span id="more-22"></span>As an internet user who never views an ad courtesy of Adblock Plus on Firefox (<a title="Adblock Plus" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865" target="_self">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865</a>), I wonder if we&#8217;re witnessing the emergence of another &#8220;bubble&#8221; in the form of hyped but unprofitable internet applications.</p>
<p><strong>I really wonder about Twitter.</strong> You can follow 100 people and never look at a single update from any of them.  Some people are in the business of gaining followers just to have more than the next guy even though nobody cares about their tweets.</p>
<p>Would you be willing to <strong>pay for the benefits of social media</strong>?  If so, how much?  I would bet that most people use social media because it&#8217;s fun and free, and would disappear in a paid arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maximusinternet.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/can-social-media-find-a-working-business-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
