In December, Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt said “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.” – Google chief: Only miscreants worry about net privacy

That’s a bold statement for the CEO of any major company, especially Google, which has a history of criticism for their privacy practices.  Google was also recently criticized for their handling of a privacy problem with the widely used Google Toolbar.

By now, everyone knows about the famous Facebook Beacon incident.  In December, Facebook made another attempt to make user information more public with their new privacy settings.  Facebook tried to spin the news as a win for users.  However, the changes were really designed to give Facebook evidence that users consented to sharing their information with the world even if users didn’t pay attention and selected Facebook’s “share with everyone” setting, the default if the user had not previously adjusted their privacy settings.

Many other major internet companies are employing similar strategies as they all struggle with the balance between keeping users happy and running profitable businesses. I respect that balance.  However, I have a problem with companies knowingly taking advantage of people who don’t read or understand their terms or bundle tracking software with other products in a misleading way.

I’m all for personal responsibility, but the fact is, most internet users don’t understand online privacy. The average person doesn’t know very much about what information is tracked, how companies use it, or how to control information collection on their computer through browser settings, add-ons, and software.

What’s next? Are we approaching the limit of tolerance for these practices?  Will there be legal action?  Will consumers stop using some of these major services?  What do you think?

All the big players have huge audiences and some have proven they can keep traffic coming back for more.  The only problem is that none of them make money.  As an internet user who never views an ad courtesy of Adblock Plus on Firefox (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865), I wonder if we’re witnessing the emergence of another “bubble” in the form of hyped but unprofitable internet applications.

I really wonder about Twitter. You can follow 100 people and never look at a single update from any of them.  Some people are in the business of gaining followers just to have more than the next guy even though nobody cares about their tweets.

Would you be willing to pay for the benefits of social media?  If so, how much?  I would bet that most people use social media because it’s fun and free, and would disappear in a paid arrangement.

To prevent a massive “land rush” to claim as many valuable URL’s as possible, Facebook implemented restrictions on who may register a name and when. Facebook’s poorly managed effort turned into a mess of confusion and misinformation. The published date when smaller companies like mine could register their username was June 29th.  I arrived on June 30th, figuring the midnight rush would be over. I visited http://facebook.com/username and started the process. When I arrived at the step to check availability for my pages and selected Maximus Internet, this is what Facebook told me:

“Maximus Internet, LLC is not eligible for a username at this time. In the future, Maximus Internet, LLC will be able to set a username.”

Wow. Thanks for the groundbreaking information. There was a “learn more” link that basically told me what I already knew – I would be eligible for a username after June 29th.  After wasting 20 minutes searching the internet for answers, I finally found out on another website that Facebook also requires your business page to have 100 fans. Why wouldn’t Facebook just say that on the initial error message?  Facebook is free and very popular, so people will tolerate a certain level of inconvenience, but too often neglected error messages are costing companies more than they think. What if the equivalent happened in your shopping cart on a high value order?

An error message happens when something has gone wrong with a process you want a user to complete, usually becoming a lead or completing a purchase. The information you provide at that critical moment can make or break your relationship with the user. At the point of error, the websites job becomes getting someone back on track easily and in a friendly manner. Don’t leave this critical task in the hands of default error messages that came with your website platform or programmers that don’t understand relationship building. Doing so will usually produce punitive error messages that make people feel stupid and/or don’t clearly explain how to correct the problem. To prevent these issues, you should always complete extensive testing of your error handling process. More importantly, make error handling a priority in your development process instead of an afterthought.